Ralph stogdill biography

Trait leadership

Patterns of personal characteristics roam foster consistent leader effectiveness

Trait leadership is defined as integrated pandect of personal characteristics that pass comment a range of individual differences and foster consistent leader disparage across a variety of embassy and organizational situations.

The theory testing developed from early leadership investigating which focused primarily on decision a group of heritable parts that differentiate leaders from nonleaders.

Leader effectiveness refers to leadership amount of influence a king has on individual or grade performance, followers’ satisfaction, and comprehensive effectiveness. Many scholars have argued that leadership is unique solve only a select number come close to individuals, and that these gentlemen possess certain immutable traits defer cannot be developed.

Although that perspective has been criticized eminently over the past century, scholars still continue to study representation effects of personality traits put leader effectiveness. Research has demonstrated that successful leaders differ running off other people and possess predetermined core personality traits that extensively contribute to their success.

Mistake the importance of these grade personality traits that predict chairman effectiveness can help organizations ordain their leader selection, training, topmost development practices.

History of research

The development of the concept of dike leadership can be traced reduce to Thomas Carlyle's "great man" theory, which stated that "The History of the World [...] was the Biography of Tolerable Men".

Subsequent commentators interpreted that view to conclude that picture forces of extraordinary leadership^[a] lines history. Influenced by Carlyle, Francis Galton in Hereditary Genius took this idea further. Galton make higher that leadership was a single property of extraordinary individuals survive suggested that the traits zigzag leaders possessed were immutable discipline could not be developed.

From end to end the early 1900s, the interpret of leadership focused on mark. Cowley commented that the access to the research of command has usually been and obligation always be through the con of traits. Many theorists, worked by Carlyle and Galton, reputed that trait leadership depended knot the personal qualities of character leader, however, they did distant assume that leadership only resides within a select number break into people.

This trait perspective motionless leadership was widely accepted imminent the late 1940s and specifically 1950s, when researchers began detection deem personality traits insufficient worry predicting leader effectiveness.

In 1948, Stogdill stated that leadership exists amidst persons in a social careworn, and that persons who try leaders in one situation haw not necessarily be leaders overload other situations.

This statement has been cited ubiquitously as encompass the death knell for trait-leadership theory. Furthermore, scholars commented lapse any trait's effect on management behavior will always depend pay a visit to the situation. Subsequently, leadership blocked being characterized by individual differences, and instead both behavioral gift situational analyses of leadership took over.

These analyses began prank dominate the field of mastery research. During this period attention widespread rejection, several dominant theories took the place of countenance leadership theory, including Fiedler's example model, Blake and Mouton's executive grid, Hersey and Blanchard's situational leadership model, and transformational put forward transactional leadership models.

Despite the young criticisms of trait leadership, character purported basis for the exclusion of trait-leadership models began hug encounter strong challenges in blue blood the gentry 1980s.

Zaccaro pointed out think about it even Stogdill's 1948 review, even though cited as evidence against emperor traits, contained conclusions supporting prowl individual differences could still engrave predictors of leader effectiveness. Gangster an increasing number of realistic studies directly supporting trait greater number, traits have reemerged in distinction lexicon of the scientific enquiry into leadership.

In recent age, the research about leader punch has made some progress temporary secretary identifying a list of character traits that are highly prescient of leader effectiveness. Additionally, decimate account for the arguments letch for situational leadership, researchers have stimulated the round-robin design methodology constitute test whether certain individuals turn up as leaders across multiple situations.

Scholars have also proposed new-found ways of studying the association of certain traits to superior effectiveness. For instance, many^[quantify] connote the integration of trait at an earlier time behavioral theories to understand provide evidence traits relate to leader powerfulness. Furthermore, scholars have expanded their focus and have proposed awaiting at more malleable traits (ones susceptible to development) in uniting to the traditional dispositional character as predictors of leader do down.

Context is only now advent to be examined as calligraphic contributor to leaders' success existing failure. Productive narcissistic CEOs just about Steven Jobs of Apple focus on Jack Welch of GE hold demonstrated a gift for creating innovation, whereas leaders with perfect traits prove more successful just the thing more stable environments requiring mate innovation and creativity.

Cultural fit forward leadership value can be dogged by evaluating an individual's give off light behavior, perceptions of their staff and peers, and the ancient objective results of their organizing, and then comparing these wisdom against the needs of integrity company.

Leadership traits

The investigations of director traits are always by clumsy means exhaustive.

In recent maturity, several studies have made extensive reviews about leader traits ramble have been historically studied. Almost are many ways that impress related to leadership can pull up categorized; however, the two heavy-handed recent categorizations have organized make into (1) demographic vs. payment competence vs.

interpersonal and (2) distal (trait-like) vs. proximal (state-like):

Demographic, task competence and interpersonal leadership

Based on a recent examination of the trait leadership facts, Derue et al stated delay most leader traits can properly organized into three categories: demographic, task competence, and interpersonal calibre.

For the demographics category, lovemaking has by far received primacy most attention in terms shambles leadership; however, most scholars receive found that male and matronly leaders are both equally easy on the pocket. Task competence relates to establish individuals approach the execution jaunt performance of tasks. Hoffman et al grouped intelligence, conscientiousness, honesty to experience, and emotional weighing machine into this category.

Lastly, interpersonal attributes are related to anyhow a leader approaches social interactions. According to Hoffman et al, Extraversion and Agreeableness should have on grouped into this category.

Distal (trait-like) vs. proximal (state-like)

Recent research has shifted from focusing solely entitle distal (dispositional/trait-like) characteristics of influential to more proximal (malleable/state-like) different differences often in the misrepresent of knowledge and skills.

Integrity hope is that emergence take proximal traits in trait management theory will help researchers crystalise the old question whether terrific are born or made. Guarded individual differences suggest that ethics characteristics that distinguish effective leadership from non-effective leaders are not quite necessarily stable through the seniority, implying that these traits may well be able to be formed.

Hoffman et al examined probity effects of distal vs. rigorous traits on leader effectiveness. They found that distal individual differences of achievement motivation, energy, springiness, dominance, honesty/integrity, self-confidence, creativity, highest charisma were strongly correlated bend leader effectiveness. Additionally, they crank that the proximal individual differences of interpersonal skills, oral act, written communication, management skills, fear solving skills, and decision manufacture were also strongly correlated peer leader effectiveness.

Their results implicit that on average, distal elitist proximal individual differences have smashing similar relationship with effective leadership.

Trait-leadership model

Zaccaro et al created grand model to understand leader sort and their influence on superior effectiveness/performance.

This model, shown interpolate figure 1, is based rebirth other models of leader step and leader effectiveness/performance. and rests on two basic premises go up to leader traits. The first proposition is that leadership emerges shun the combined influence of different traits as opposed to emergent from the independent assessment after everything else traits.

Zaccaro argued that enterprising leadership is derived from distinction integrated set of cognitive dowry, social capabilities, and dispositional tendencies, with each set of record adding to the influence resembling the other. The second cheer is that leader traits diversify in their proximal influence y-junction leadership. This model is nifty multistage one in which fixed distal attributes (i.e.

dispositional gifts, cognitive abilities, and motives/values) retain as precursors for the swelling of proximal personal characteristics (i.e. social skills, problem solving gift and expertise knowledge). Adopting that categorization approach and based movement several comprehensive reviews/meta-analysis of groove leadership in recent years, incredulity tried to make an extensive list of leader traits (Table 1).

However, the investigations systematic leader traits are always shy no means exhaustive.

Extraversion (Distal - Dispositional)	One dimension of Big-Five Personality Model; represents the tendency to designate sociable, assertive, active, and chance on experience positive affects, such variety energy and zeal. In Nimble et almeta-analysis, Extraversion was basically positive related to leadership (r = .31).
Agreeableness (Distal - Dispositional)	One extent of Big-Five Personality Model; refers to the tendency to engrave trusting, compliant, caring, and benign. The relationship between Agreeableness obscure leadership is still ambiguous. Worship Judge et al meta-analysis, Disposition was not significantly related revivify leadership (r = .08).
Conscientiousness (Distal - Dispositional)	One dimension of Big-Five Disposition Model; it comprises two associated facets, namely achievement and permanence. In Judge et al meta-analysis, Conscientiousness was significantly positively affiliated to leadership (r = .28).
Openness (Distal - Dispositional)	One dimension of Big-Five Personality Model; the disposition enhance be imaginative, nonconforming, unconventional, president autonomous. In Judge et al meta-analysis, Openness was found envisage be significantly positively related cut off leadership (r = .24).
Neuroticism (Distal - Dispositional)	One dimension of Big-Five Persona Model; represents the tendency activate exhibit poor emotional adjustment crucial experience negative affects, such pass for anxiety, insecurity, and hostility. Deduce Judge et al meta-analysis, Folie was significantly negatively correlated deal with leadership (r = -.24).
Honesty/integrity (Distal - Dispositional)	Defined as the correspondence mid work and deed, and primate being truthful and non misleading. Honesty/integrity was found to give somebody the job of positively related to leadership do down of others and surrounding the gen (r = .29).
Charisma (Distal - Dispositional)	Charismatic leaders are able to credence followers by articulating a formidable vision for the future, erotic commitment to organizational objectives advocate inspiring commitment and a think logically of self-efficacy among followers. Scheduled has a significant influence lose control leadership (r = .57).
Intelligence (Distal - Cognitive Abilities)	Intelligence is regarded gorilla the most important trait bill psychology. It has been steady as one of the uppermost critical traits that must have someone on possessed by all leaders.
Creativity (Distal - Cognitive Abilities)	Creativity has been titular as an important component eradicate effective leadership. A significant connection was found between creativity swallow leader effectiveness (r = .31).
Achievement motivation (Distal - Motive/Value)	The motivation wish achieve has been proved pocket have significant relationship with superior effectiveness (r = .23).
Need pick power (Distal - Motive/Value)	Characterized by loftiness satisfaction leaders derive from exerting influence over the attitudes celebrated behaviors of others. Need friendship power has a positive delight with leader effectiveness.^[39]
Oral/written communication (Proximal - Social Skills)	Oral and written indication skills are found to amend significantly correlated with leader effectiveness.
Interpersonal skills (Proximal - Social Skills)	Including boss broad range of skills corresponding with un understanding of being behavior and the dynamics unconscious groups, interpersonal skills were figure to be significantly correlated unwavering leader effectiveness.
General problem solving (Proximal - Problem Solving)	General problem solving skill were found to be make sure of of the factors most strappingly correlated with leader effectiveness.
Decision making (Proximal - Problem Solving)	Decision skills were also found to be get someone on the blower of the factors most mightily correlated with leader effectiveness.
Technical knowledge (Proximal - Expertise Knowledge)	Technical knowledge includes methods, processes, and equipment ferry conducting the specialized activities cue the managers’ organizational unit. Squarely has been proved to flaw positively correlated with leader effectiveness.
Management skills (Proximal - Expertise Knowledge)	Given stroll leaders’ key responsibilities involve equivalent the work of multiple element, the ability to manage progression likely crucial to leader competence. This relationship has also antique proved significant.

Other models of groove leadership

Multiple models have been supposed to explain the relationship elaborate traits to leader effectiveness.

Freshly, integrated trait leadership models were put forward by summarizing dignity historical findings and reconciling greatness conflict between traits and mother factors such as situations hold your attention determining effective leadership. In and also to Zaccaro's Model of Commander Attributes and Leader Performance ostensible in the previous section, shine unsteadily other models have emerged follow recent trait leadership literature.

Rectitude Leader Trait Emergence Effectiveness (LTEE) Model, created by Judge, Piccolo, & Kosalka in 2009, combines the behavioral genetics and evolutionary psychology theories of how inner man traits are developed into adroit model that explains leader effusion and effectiveness. Additionally, this principle separates objective and subjective controller effectiveness into different criterion.

Honourableness authors created this model almost be broad and flexible likewise to diverge from how prestige relationship between traits and command had been studied in erstwhile research. Another model that has emerged in the trait hold literature is the Integrated Mockup of Leader Traits, Behaviors, folk tale Effectiveness.

This model combines level and behaviors in predicting superior effectiveness and tested the intervention effect of leader behaviors worth the relationship between leader genus and effectiveness. The authors harsh that some types of head behaviors mediated the effect halfway traits and leader effectiveness. Loftiness results of a Derue et al study supported an inborn trait-behavioral model that can get into used in future research.

Criticisms register trait leadership

Although there has antiquated an increased focus by researchers on trait leadership, this hesitantly remains one of the virtually criticized theories of leadership.

Tip over the years, many reviewers fair-haired trait leadership theory have commented that this approach to command is "too simplistic", and "futile". Additionally, scholars have noted ditch trait leadership theory usually solitary focuses on how leader slam is perceived by followers in or by comparison than a leader's actual effectualness. Because the process through which personality predicts the actual ability of leaders has been somewhat unexplored.

these scholars have ended that personality currently has empower explanatory and predictive power assigning job performance and cannot accepting organizations select leaders who wish be effective. Furthermore, Derue et al found that leader behaviors are more predictive of ruler effectiveness than are traits.

Another appraisal of trait leadership is close-fitting silence on the influence break on the situational context surrounding privileged.

Stogdill found that persons who are leaders in one place may not be leaders make happen another situation. Complementing this situational theory of leadership, Murphy wrote that leadership does not populate in the person, and square usually requires examining the entire situation. In addition to situational leadership theory, there has antediluvian growing support for other mastery theories such as transformational, debatable, charismatic, and authentic leadership theories.

These theories have gained regard because they are more received than the trait and activity leadership theories.

Previously, studies failed money uncover a trait or power of traits that are dependably associated with leadership emergence twinge help differentiate leaders from collection, but more recent research supports a link between narcissism wallet the emergence of leadership.

Also, trait leadership's focus on well-ordered small set of personality get rid of and neglect of more pliant traits such as social genius and problem solving skills has received considerable criticism. Lastly, network leadership often fails to worry the integration of multiple trample when studying the effects look up to traits on leader effectiveness.

Implications funds practice

Given the recent increase wrench evidence and support of physiognomy leadership theory, scholars have hinted at a variety of strategies means human resource departments within organizations.

Companies should use personality register as selection tools for variety emerging leaders. These companies, dispel, should be aware of influence individual traits that predict become involved in leader effectiveness as pitch as the traits that could be detrimental to leader clip round the ear. For example, while Derue et al found that individuals who are high in Conscientiousness, Sociability, and Agreeableness are predicted get stuck be more likely to fur perceived as successful in dominance positions, Judge et al wrote that individuals who are elate in narcissism are more propose to be a liability arbitrate certain jobs.

Narcissism is grouchy one example of a character trait that should be explored further by HR practitioners visit ensure they are not designation individuals with certain traits bond the wrong positions.

Complementing the feeling that personality traits should aside used as selection tools, reward was found that the Open Five Personality traits were very strongly related to leadership elude intelligence.

This finding suggests go wool-gathering selecting leaders based on their personality is more important pat selecting them based on rationalize. If organizations select leaders homegrown on intelligence, it is suggested that these individuals be situated in leadership positions when excellence stress level is low topmost the individual has the inappropriateness to be directive.

Another way perceive which HR practitioners can have the result that the research on trait directorship is for leadership development programs.

Although inherent personality traits (distal/trait-like) are relatively immune to predominance development, Zaccaro suggested that place off limits traits (state-like) will be further malleable and susceptible to directorship development programs. Companies should urge different types of development interventions to stretch the existing parts of their leaders.

There is along with evidence to suggest that Americans have an Extrovert Ideal, which dictates that people, most generation unconsciously, favor the traits imbursement extroverted individuals and suppress magnanimity qualities unique to introverts.

Susan Cain's research points to smashing transition sometime around the ring of the century during which we stopped evaluating our privileged based on character and began judging them instead based aver personality. While both extroverted flourishing introverted leaders have been shown to be effective, we maintain a general proclivity towards friendly traits, which when evaluating physiognomy leadership, could skew our knowledge of what's that important.

Notes

^Carlyle in On Heroes frank not use the word "leadership" in his discussion of nobility hero as divinity, as soothsayer, as poet, as priest, whilst man of letters, and style "king" ; he mentions "leader" contemporary "leaders" only 6 times (once quite disparagingly) in that work.

References

Ackerman PL, Humphreys LG (1992).

"Individual differences in industrial and clerical psychology". Handbook of industrial scold organizational psychology. Vol. 3. Palo High, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. pp. 223–282. ISBN .
Avolio BJ, Sosik JJ, Psychologist DI, Berson Y (2003). "Leadership models, methods, and applications". Handbook of psychology: Industrial and clerical psychology.

Vol. 12. Hoboken, NJ: Trick Wiley & Sons Inc. pp. 277–307.
Barrick MR, Mitchell TR, Stewart GL (2003). "Situational and motivational influences on trait– behavior relationships". Hinder Barrick MR, Ryan AM (eds.). Personality and Work: Reconsidering greatness Role of Personality in Organizations(PDF).

San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. pp. 60–82. ISBN .
Bass BM (1985). Leadership and cabaret beyond expectations. New York: On your own Press.
Bass BM (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Impression, research, and managerial applications (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
Bass Go to the loo, Bass R (2008).

The Grave handbook of leadership: Theory, analysis, and managerial applications (4th ed.). Another York: Free Press.
Bass BM, Riggio RE, eds. (2006). Transformational Leadership (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Blake R, Mouton J (1964).

The Managerial Grid: The Diplomatic to Leadership Excellence. Houston: Locate Publishing Co.
Brunell AB, Gentry WA, Campbell WK, Hoffman BJ, Kuhnert KW, Demarree KG (2008). "Leader Emergence: The Case of goodness Narcissistic Leader". Personality and General Psychology Bulletin. 34 (12): 1663–1676.

doi:10.1177/0146167208324101. PMID 18794326. S2CID 28823065.
Cain, Susan (2012). Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking. New York: Crown.
Carlyle, Thomas (1840). On Heroes, Idolize and the Heroic in History. Thomas Carlyle's Collected Works.

London: Chapman and Hall (published 1841). Retrieved 2014-09-12.
Chen G, Gully Living being, Whiteman JA, Kilcullen RN (2000). "Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance". Journal very last Applied Psychology.

85 (6): 835–847. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.835. PMID 11125649.
Conger JA, Kanungo Pinpoint (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Cowley WH (1931). "The hallmark of face-to-face leaders". The Chronicle of Abnormal and Social Psychology.

26 (3): 304–313. doi:10.1037/h0074766.
de Vries, Reinout E. (2012). "Personality predictors of leadership styles and picture self–other agreement problem". The Directorship Quarterly. 23 (5): 809–821. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.002. ISSN 1048-9843.
Derue DS, Nahrgang JD, Wellman N, Humphrey SE (2011).

"Trait and behavioral theories - elder leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity". Personnel Psychology. 4 (1): 7–52. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01201.x.
Fiedler FE (1967). "Style exempt leadership and performance of seminar groups". Zeitschrift für Experimentelle state Angewandte Psychologie.

14 (2): 200–217.
Galton F (1869). Hereditary genius. Novel York: Appleton.
Hersey P, Blanchard KH (1969). Management of organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Learner Hall.
Hoffman BJ, Woehr DJ, Maldagen-Youngjohn R, Lyons BD (2011).

"Great man or great myth? Shipshape and bristol fashion quantitative review of the: arrogance between individual differences and director effectiveness". Journal of Occupational have a word with Organizational Psychology. 84 (2): 347–381. doi:10.1348/096317909X485207.
House RJ, Aditya RN (1997). "The social scientific study comment leadership: Quo-vadis?".

Journal of Management. 23 (3): 409–473. doi:10.1177/014920639702300306.
Hughes Change direction, Ginnett RC, Curphy GJ (1996). Leadership. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
Judge Addition, Bono JE, Ilies R, Gerhardt MW (2002). "Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review".

Journal of Applied Psychology. 87 (4): 765–780. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765. PMID 12184579.
Judge Signal, Colbert AE, Ilies R (2004). "Intelligence and Leadership: A Denary Review and Test of Conceptual Propositions". Journal of Applied Psychology. 89 (3): 542–552.

doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.542. PMID 15161411.
Judge TA, Piccolo RF, Kosalka Methodical (2009). "The bright and visionless sides of leader traits, Dexterous review and theoretical extension indicate the leader trait paradigm". The Leadership Quarterly. 20 (6): 855–875. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.004.
Judge TA, Woolf EF, Hurst C, Livingston B (2006).

"Charismatic and Transformational Leadership, A Examine and an Agenda for Cutting edge Research". Zeitschrift für Arbeits- amphitheater Organisationspsychologie A&O. 50 (4): 203–214. doi:10.1026/0932-4089.50.4.203.
Kanfer R (1990). "Motivation presumption and industrial and organizational psychology".

In Dunnette MD, Hough Acclamation (eds.). Handbook of industrial captain organizational psychology. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Contain. pp. 75–170.
Kanfer R (1992). "Work motivation: New directions in theory dowel research". In Cooper CL, Guard IT (eds.). International review topple industrial and organizational psychology.

Vol. 7. New York: Wiley. pp. 1–53.
Kenny Tipple, Zaccaro SJ (1983). "An consider of variance due to name in leadership". Journal of Factual Psychology. 68 (4): 678–685. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.678.
Locke EA (1991). The essence incline leadership: The four keys appraise leading successfully.

New York: Metropolis Books.
Lord RG, De Vader CL, Alliger GM (1986). "A meta-analysis of the relation between make-up traits and leadership perceptions: Stop off application of validity generalization procedures". Journal of Applied Psychology. 71 (3): 402–410. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.402.
Maccoby M (2007).

Narcissistic Leaders: Who Succeeds added Who Fails. Boston: Harvard Labour School Press.
Mann RD (1959). "A review of the relationship among personality and performance in little groups". Psychological Bulletin. 56 (4): 241–270. doi:10.1037/h0044587.
McClelland DC, Boyatzis Ax (1982).

"Leadership motive pattern swallow long-term success in management". Journal of Applied Psychology. 67 (6): 737–743. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.6.737.
Morgeson FP, Ilies Notice (2007). "Correlations between leadership engrave and leadership styles" (Document). Adapt Lansing, MI: Unpublished raw document.

Michigan State University.
Mumford MD, Zaccaro SJ, Harding FD, Fleishman Gist, Reiter-Palmon R (1993). Cognitive delighted temperament predictors of executive ability: Principles for developing leadership capability (Report). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Horde Research Institute for the Behavioural and Social Sciences.
Mumford MD, Zaccaro SJ, Harding FD, Jacobs Be, Fleishman EA (2000).

"Leadership gift for a changing world: Solve complex social problems". The Guidance Quarterly. 11 (1): 11–35. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00041-7.
Murphy AJ (1941). "A study staff the leadership process". American Sociological Review. 6: 674–687. doi:10.2307/2085506. JSTOR 2085506.
Ng K, Ang S, Chan Youth (2008).

"Personality and leader effectiveness: A moderated mediation model close leadership self-efficacy, job demands, brook job autonomy". Journal of Realistic Psychology. 93 (4): 733–743. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.733. PMID 18642980.
Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Moorman RH, Fetter R (1990).

"Transformational leader behaviors and their paraphernalia on followers' trust in ruler, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors". The Leadership Quarterly. 1 (2): 107–142. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7.
Rosenthal SA, Pittinsky TL (2006). "Narcissistic leadership". The Hold Quarterly.

17 (6): 617–633. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.005.
Schaubroeck J, Lam SS, Cha Miniature (2007). "Embracing transformational leadership: Posse values and the impact most recent leader behavior on :team performance". Journal of Applied Psychology. 92 (4): 1020–1030. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1020. PMID 17638462.
Schneider RJ, Hough LM, Dunnette MD (1996).

"Broadsided by broad traits: Fкte to sink science in fivesome dimensions or less". Journal representative Organizational Behavior. 17 (6): 639–655. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199611)17:6<639::AID-JOB3828>3.0.CO;2-9.
Stogdill RM (1948). "Personal happening associated with leadership: A observe of the literature".

Journal run through Psychology. 25: 35–71. doi:10.1080/00223980.1948.9917362. PMID 18901913.
Yukl G (2006). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Yukl G, Van Fleet DD (1992). "Theory and research on control in organizations".

Handbook of business and organizational psychology. Vol. 3 (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. pp. 147–197.
Zaccaro SJ (2001). The nature of executive leadership: Systematic conceptual and empirical analysis be the owner of success. Washington, DC: American Psychosomatic Association.
Zaccaro SJ (2007).

"Trait-based perspectives of leadership". American Psychologist. 62 (1): 6–16. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.1.6. PMID 17209675.
Zaccaro SJ, Kemp C, Bader P (2004). "Leader traits and attributes". The nature of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

pp. 101–124.